reference, declarationdefinition
definition → references, declarations, derived classes, virtual overrides
reference to multiple definitions → definitions
unreferenced
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
   10
   11
   12
   13
   14
   15
   16
   17
   18
   19
   20
   21
   22
   23
   24
   25
   26
   27
   28
   29
   30
   31
   32
   33
   34
   35
   36
   37
   38
   39
   40
   41
   42
   43
   44
   45
   46
   47
   48
   49
   50
   51
   52
   53
   54
   55
   56
   57
   58
   59
   60
   61
   62
   63
   64
   65
   66
   67
   68
   69
   70
   71
   72
   73
   74
   75
   76
   77
   78
   79
   80
   81
   82
   83
   84
   85
   86
   87
   88
   89
   90
   91
   92
   93
   94
   95
   96
   97
   98
   99
  100
  101
  102
  103
  104
  105
  106
  107
  108
  109
  110
  111
  112
  113
  114
  115
  116
  117
  118
  119
  120
  121
  122
  123
  124
  125
  126
  127
  128
  129
  130
  131
  132
  133
  134
  135
  136
  137
  138
  139
  140
  141
  142
  143
  144
  145
  146
  147
  148
  149
  150
  151
  152
  153
  154
  155
  156
  157
  158
  159
  160
  161
  162
  163
  164
  165
  166
  167
  168
  169
  170
  171
  172
  173
  174
  175
  176
  177
  178
  179
  180
  181
  182
  183
  184
  185
  186
  187
  188
  189
  190
  191
  192
  193
  194
  195
  196
  197
  198
  199
  200
  201
  202
  203
  204
  205
  206
  207
  208
  209
  210
  211
  212
  213
  214
  215
  216
  217
  218
  219
  220
  221
  222
// Check that delete exprs call aligned (de)allocation functions if
// -faligned-allocation is passed in both C++11 and C++14.
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fexceptions -fsized-deallocation -faligned-allocation %s -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -o - | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 -fexceptions -fsized-deallocation -faligned-allocation %s -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -o - | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++1z -fexceptions -fsized-deallocation %s -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -o - | FileCheck %s

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++1z -fexceptions -fsized-deallocation %s -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-windows-msvc -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-MS

// Check that we don't used aligned (de)allocation without -faligned-allocation or C++1z.
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 -DUNALIGNED -fexceptions %s -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-UNALIGNED
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++1z -DUNALIGNED -fexceptions -fno-aligned-allocation %s -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-UNALIGNED

// CHECK-UNALIGNED-NOT: _Znwm_St11align_val_t
// CHECK-UNALIGNED-NOT: _Znam_St11align_val_t
// CHECK-UNALIGNED-NOT: _ZdlPv_St11align_val_t
// CHECK-UNALIGNED-NOT: _ZdaPv_St11align_val_t
// CHECK-UNALIGNED-NOT: _ZdlPvm_St11align_val_t
// CHECK-UNALIGNED-NOT: _ZdaPvm_St11align_val_t

typedef decltype(sizeof(0)) size_t;
namespace std { enum class align_val_t : size_t {}; }

#define OVERALIGNED alignas(__STDCPP_DEFAULT_NEW_ALIGNMENT__ * 2)

// Global new and delete.
// ======================
struct OVERALIGNED A { A(); int n[128]; };

// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2a0v()
// CHECK: %[[ALLOC:.*]] = call i8* @_ZnwmSt11align_val_t(i64 512, i64 32)
// CHECK: call void @_ZdlPvSt11align_val_t(i8* %[[ALLOC]], i64 32)
// CHECK-MS-LABEL: define {{.*}} @"?a0@@YAPEAXXZ"()
// CHECK-MS: %[[ALLOC:.*]] = call i8* @"??2@YAPEAX_KW4align_val_t@std@@@Z"(i64 512, i64 32)
// CHECK-MS: cleanuppad
// CHECK-MS: call void @"??3@YAXPEAXW4align_val_t@std@@@Z"(i8* %[[ALLOC]], i64 32)
void *a0() { return new A; }

// FIXME: Why don't we call the sized array deallocation overload in this case?
// The size is known.
//
// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2a1l(
// CHECK: %[[ALLOC:.*]] = call i8* @_ZnamSt11align_val_t(i64 %{{.*}}, i64 32)
// No array cookie.
// CHECK-NOT: store
// CHECK: invoke void @_ZN1AC1Ev(
// CHECK: call void @_ZdaPvSt11align_val_t(i8* %[[ALLOC]], i64 32)
// CHECK-MS-LABEL: define {{.*}} @"?a1@@YAPEAXJ@Z"(
// CHECK-MS: %[[ALLOC:.*]] = call i8* @"??_U@YAPEAX_KW4align_val_t@std@@@Z"(i64 %{{.*}}, i64 32)
// No array cookie.
// CHECK-MS-NOT: store
// CHECK-MS: invoke %struct.A* @"??0A@@QEAA@XZ"(
// CHECK-MS: cleanuppad
// CHECK-MS: call void @"??_V@YAXPEAXW4align_val_t@std@@@Z"(i8* %[[ALLOC]], i64 32)
void *a1(long n) { return new A[n]; }

// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2a2P1A(
// CHECK: call void @_ZdlPvmSt11align_val_t(i8* %{{.*}}, i64 512, i64 32) #9
void a2(A *p) { delete p; }

// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2a3P1A(
// CHECK: call void @_ZdaPvSt11align_val_t(i8* %{{.*}}, i64 32) #9
void a3(A *p) { delete[] p; }


// Class-specific usual new and delete.
// ====================================
struct OVERALIGNED B {
  B();
  // These are just a distraction. We should ignore them.
  void *operator new(size_t);
  void operator delete(void*, size_t);
  void operator delete[](void*, size_t);

  void *operator new(size_t, std::align_val_t);
  void operator delete(void*, std::align_val_t);
  void operator delete[](void*, std::align_val_t);

  int n[128];
};

// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2b0v()
// CHECK: %[[ALLOC:.*]] = call i8* @_ZN1BnwEmSt11align_val_t(i64 512, i64 32)
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1BdlEPvSt11align_val_t(i8* %[[ALLOC]], i64 32)
void *b0() { return new B; }

// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2b1l(
// CHECK: %[[ALLOC:.*]] = call i8* @_ZnamSt11align_val_t(i64 %{{.*}}, i64 32)
// No array cookie.
// CHECK-NOT: store
// CHECK: invoke void @_ZN1BC1Ev(
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1BdaEPvSt11align_val_t(i8* %[[ALLOC]], i64 32)
void *b1(long n) { return new B[n]; }

// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2b2P1B(
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1BdlEPvSt11align_val_t(i8* %{{.*}}, i64 32)
void b2(B *p) { delete p; }

// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2b3P1B(
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1BdaEPvSt11align_val_t(i8* %{{.*}}, i64 32)
void b3(B *p) { delete[] p; }

struct OVERALIGNED C {
  C();
  void *operator new[](size_t, std::align_val_t);
  void operator delete[](void*, size_t, std::align_val_t);

  // It doesn't matter that we have an unaligned operator delete[] that doesn't
  // want the size. What matters is that the aligned one does.
  void operator delete[](void*);
};

// This one has an array cookie.
// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2b4l(
// CHECK: call {{.*}} @llvm.umul.with.overflow{{.*}}i64 32
// CHECK: call {{.*}} @llvm.uadd.with.overflow{{.*}}i64 32
// CHECK: %[[ALLOC:.*]] = call i8* @_ZN1CnaEmSt11align_val_t(i64 %{{.*}}, i64 32)
// CHECK: store
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1CC1Ev(
//
// Note, we're still calling a placement allocation function, and there is no
// matching placement operator delete. =(
// FIXME: This seems broken.
// CHECK-NOT: call void @_ZN1CdaEPvmSt11align_val_t(
#ifndef UNALIGNED
void *b4(long n) { return new C[n]; }
#endif

// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2b5P1C(
// CHECK: mul i64{{.*}} 32
// CHECK: add i64{{.*}} 32
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1CdaEPvmSt11align_val_t(
void b5(C *p) { delete[] p; }


// Global placement new.
// =====================

struct Q { int n; } q;
void *operator new(size_t, Q);
void *operator new(size_t, std::align_val_t, Q);
void operator delete(void*, Q);
void operator delete(void*, std::align_val_t, Q);

// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2c0v(
// CHECK: %[[ALLOC:.*]] = call i8* @_ZnwmSt11align_val_t1Q(i64 512, i64 32, i32 %
// CHECK: call void @_ZdlPvSt11align_val_t1Q(i8* %[[ALLOC]], i64 32, i32 %
void *c0() { return new (q) A; }


// Class-specific placement new.
// =============================

struct OVERALIGNED D {
  D();
  void *operator new(size_t, Q);
  void *operator new(size_t, std::align_val_t, Q);
  void operator delete(void*, Q);
  void operator delete(void*, std::align_val_t, Q);
};

// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2d0v(
// CHECK: %[[ALLOC:.*]] = call i8* @_ZN1DnwEmSt11align_val_t1Q(i64 32, i64 32, i32 %
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1DdlEPvSt11align_val_t1Q(i8* %[[ALLOC]], i64 32, i32 %
void *d0() { return new (q) D; }


// Calling aligned new with placement syntax.
// ==========================================

#ifndef UNALIGNED
// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2e0v(
// CHECK: %[[ALLOC:.*]] = call i8* @_ZnwmSt11align_val_t(i64 512, i64 5)
// CHECK: call void @_ZdlPvSt11align_val_t(i8* %[[ALLOC]], i64 5)
void *e0() { return new (std::align_val_t(5)) A; }

// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2e1v(
// CHECK: %[[ALLOC:.*]] = call i8* @_ZN1BnwEmSt11align_val_t(i64 512, i64 5)
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1BdlEPvSt11align_val_t(i8* %[[ALLOC]], i64 5)
void *e1() { return new (std::align_val_t(5)) B; }
#endif

// Variadic placement/non-placement allocation functions.
// ======================================================

struct OVERALIGNED F {
  F();
  void *operator new(size_t, ...);
  void operator delete(void*, ...);
  int n[128];
};

// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2f0v(
// CHECK: %[[ALLOC:.*]] = call i8* (i64, ...) @_ZN1FnwEmz(i64 512, i64 32)
// Non-placement allocation function, uses normal deallocation lookup which
// cares about whether a parameter has type std::align_val_t.
// CHECK: call void (i8*, ...) @_ZN1FdlEPvz(i8* %[[ALLOC]])
void *f0() { return new F; }

// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2f1v(
// CHECK: %[[ALLOC:.*]] = call i8* (i64, ...) @_ZN1FnwEmz(i64 512, i64 32, i32 %
// Placement allocation function, uses placement deallocation matching, which
// passes same arguments and therefore includes alignment.
// CHECK: call void (i8*, ...) @_ZN1FdlEPvz(i8* %[[ALLOC]], i64 32, i32 %
void *f1() { return new (q) F; }

struct OVERALIGNED G {
  G();
  void *operator new(size_t, std::align_val_t, ...);
  void operator delete(void*, std::align_val_t, ...);
  int n[128];
};
#ifndef UNALIGNED
// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2g0v
// CHECK: %[[ALLOC:.*]] = call i8* (i64, i64, ...) @_ZN1GnwEmSt11align_val_tz(i64 512, i64 32)
// CHECK: call void (i8*, i64, ...) @_ZN1GdlEPvSt11align_val_tz(i8* %[[ALLOC]], i64 32)
void *g0() { return new G; }

// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z2g1v
// CHECK: %[[ALLOC:.*]] = call i8* (i64, i64, ...) @_ZN1GnwEmSt11align_val_tz(i64 512, i64 32, i32 %
// CHECK: call void (i8*, i64, ...) @_ZN1GdlEPvSt11align_val_tz(i8* %[[ALLOC]], i64 32, i32 %
void *g1() { return new (q) G; }
#endif