reference, declarationdefinition
definition → references, declarations, derived classes, virtual overrides
reference to multiple definitions → definitions
unreferenced
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
   10
   11
   12
   13
   14
   15
   16
   17
   18
   19
   20
   21
   22
   23
   24
   25
   26
   27
   28
   29
   30
   31
   32
   33
   34
   35
   36
   37
   38
   39
   40
   41
   42
   43
   44
   45
   46
   47
   48
   49
   50
   51
   52
   53
   54
   55
   56
   57
   58
   59
   60
   61
   62
   63
   64
   65
   66
   67
   68
   69
   70
   71
   72
   73
   74
   75
   76
   77
   78
   79
   80
   81
   82
   83
   84
   85
   86
   87
   88
   89
   90
   91
   92
   93
   94
   95
   96
   97
   98
   99
  100
  101
  102
  103
  104
  105
  106
  107
  108
  109
  110
  111
  112
  113
  114
  115
  116
  117
  118
  119
  120
  121
  122
  123
  124
  125
  126
  127
  128
  129
  130
  131
  132
  133
  134
  135
  136
  137
  138
  139
  140
  141
  142
  143
  144
  145
  146
  147
  148
  149
  150
  151
  152
  153
  154
  155
  156
  157
  158
  159
  160
  161
  162
  163
  164
  165
  166
  167
  168
  169
  170
  171
  172
  173
  174
  175
  176
  177
  178
  179
  180
  181
  182
  183
  184
  185
  186
  187
  188
  189
  190
  191
  192
  193
  194
  195
  196
  197
  198
  199
  200
  201
  202
  203
  204
  205
  206
  207
  208
  209
  210
  211
  212
  213
  214
  215
  216
  217
  218
  219
  220
  221
  222
  223
  224
  225
  226
  227
  228
  229
  230
  231
  232
  233
  234
  235
  236
  237
  238
  239
  240
  241
  242
  243
  244
  245
  246
  247
  248
  249
  250
  251
  252
  253
  254
  255
  256
  257
  258
  259
  260
  261
  262
  263
  264
  265
  266
  267
  268
  269
  270
  271
  272
  273
  274
  275
  276
  277
  278
  279
  280
  281
  282
  283
  284
  285
  286
  287
  288
  289
  290
  291
  292
  293
  294
  295
  296
  297
  298
  299
  300
  301
  302
  303
  304
  305
  306
  307
  308
  309
  310
  311
  312
  313
  314
  315
  316
  317
  318
  319
  320
  321
  322
  323
  324
  325
  326
  327
  328
  329
  330
  331
  332
  333
  334
  335
  336
  337
  338
  339
  340
  341
  342
  343
  344
  345
  346
  347
  348
  349
  350
  351
  352
  353
  354
  355
  356
  357
  358
  359
  360
  361
  362
  363
  364
  365
  366
  367
  368
  369
  370
  371
  372
  373
  374
  375
  376
  377
  378
  379
  380
  381
  382
  383
  384
  385
  386
  387
  388
  389
  390
  391
  392
  393
  394
  395
  396
  397
  398
  399
  400
  401
  402
  403
  404
  405
  406
  407
  408
  409
  410
  411
  412
  413
  414
  415
  416
  417
  418
  419
  420
  421
  422
  423
  424
  425
  426
  427
  428
  429
  430
  431
  432
  433
  434
  435
  436
  437
  438
  439
  440
  441
  442
  443
  444
  445
  446
  447
  448
  449
  450
  451
  452
  453
  454
  455
  456
  457
  458
  459
  460
  461
  462
  463
  464
  465
  466
  467
  468
  469
  470
  471
  472
  473
  474
  475
  476
  477
  478
  479
  480
  481
  482
  483
  484
  485
  486
  487
  488
  489
  490
  491
  492
  493
  494
  495
  496
  497
  498
  499
  500
  501
  502
  503
  504
  505
  506
  507
  508
  509
  510
  511
  512
  513
  514
  515
  516
  517
  518
  519
  520
  521
  522
  523
  524
  525
  526
  527
  528
; RUN: opt -S -early-cse < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -S -basicaa -early-cse-memssa | FileCheck %s

declare void @llvm.experimental.guard(i1,...)

declare void @llvm.assume(i1)

define i32 @test0(i32* %ptr, i1 %cond) {
; We can do store to load forwarding over a guard, since it does not
; clobber memory

; CHECK-LABEL: @test0(
; CHECK-NEXT:  store i32 40, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK-NEXT:  ret i32 40

  store i32 40, i32* %ptr
  call void(i1,...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond) [ "deopt"() ]
  %rval = load i32, i32* %ptr
  ret i32 %rval
}

define i32 @test1(i32* %val, i1 %cond) {
; We can CSE loads over a guard, since it does not clobber memory

; CHECK-LABEL: @test1(
; CHECK-NEXT:  %val0 = load i32, i32* %val
; CHECK-NEXT:  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK-NEXT:  ret i32 0

  %val0 = load i32, i32* %val
  call void(i1,...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond) [ "deopt"() ]
  %val1 = load i32, i32* %val
  %rval = sub i32 %val0, %val1
  ret i32 %rval
}

define i32 @test2() {
; Guards on "true" get removed

; CHECK-LABEL: @test2(
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 0
  call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 true) [ "deopt"() ]
  ret i32 0
}

define i32 @test3(i32 %val) {
; After a guard has executed the condition it was guarding is known to
; be true.

; CHECK-LABEL: @test3(
; CHECK-NEXT:  %cond0 = icmp slt i32 %val, 40
; CHECK-NEXT:  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond0) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK-NEXT:  ret i32 -1

  %cond0 = icmp slt i32 %val, 40
  call void(i1,...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond0) [ "deopt"() ]
  %cond1 = icmp slt i32 %val, 40
  call void(i1,...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond1) [ "deopt"() ]

  %cond2 = icmp slt i32 %val, 40
  %rval = sext i1 %cond2 to i32
  ret i32 %rval
}

define i32 @test3.unhandled(i32 %val) {
; After a guard has executed the condition it was guarding is known to
; be true.

; CHECK-LABEL: @test3.unhandled(
; CHECK-NEXT:  %cond0 = icmp slt i32 %val, 40
; CHECK-NEXT:  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond0) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK-NEXT:  %cond1 = icmp sge i32 %val, 40
; CHECK-NEXT:  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond1) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK-NEXT:  ret i32 0

; Demonstrates a case we do not yet handle (it is legal to fold %cond2
; to false)
  %cond0 = icmp slt i32 %val, 40
  call void(i1,...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond0) [ "deopt"() ]
  %cond1 = icmp sge i32 %val, 40
  call void(i1,...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond1) [ "deopt"() ]
  ret i32 0
}

define i32 @test4(i32 %val, i1 %c) {
; Same as test3, but with some control flow involved.

; CHECK-LABEL: @test4(
; CHECK: entry:
; CHECK-NEXT:  %cond0 = icmp slt i32 %val, 40
; CHECK-NEXT:  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond0
; CHECK-NEXT:  br label %bb0

; CHECK:     bb0:
; CHECK-NEXT:  %cond2 = icmp ult i32 %val, 200
; CHECK-NEXT:  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond2
; CHECK-NEXT:  br i1 %c, label %left, label %right

; CHECK:     left:
; CHECK-NEXT:  ret i32 0

; CHECK:     right:
; CHECK-NEXT:  ret i32 20

entry:
  %cond0 = icmp slt i32 %val, 40
  call void(i1,...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond0) [ "deopt"() ]
  %cond1 = icmp slt i32 %val, 40
  call void(i1,...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond1) [ "deopt"() ]
  br label %bb0

bb0:
  %cond2 = icmp ult i32 %val, 200
  call void(i1,...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond2) [ "deopt"() ]
  br i1 %c, label %left, label %right

left:
  %cond3 = icmp ult i32 %val, 200
  call void(i1,...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond3) [ "deopt"() ]
  ret i32 0

right:
 ret i32 20
}

define i32 @test5(i32 %val, i1 %c) {
; Same as test4, but the %left block has mutliple predecessors.

; CHECK-LABEL: @test5(

; CHECK: entry:
; CHECK-NEXT:  %cond0 = icmp slt i32 %val, 40
; CHECK-NEXT:  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond0
; CHECK-NEXT:  br label %bb0

; CHECK: bb0:
; CHECK-NEXT:  %cond2 = icmp ult i32 %val, 200
; CHECK-NEXT:  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond2
; CHECK-NEXT:  br i1 %c, label %left, label %right

; CHECK: left:
; CHECK-NEXT:  br label %right

; CHECK: right:
; CHECK-NEXT:  br label %left

entry:
  %cond0 = icmp slt i32 %val, 40
  call void(i1,...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond0) [ "deopt"() ]
  %cond1 = icmp slt i32 %val, 40
  call void(i1,...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond1) [ "deopt"() ]
  br label %bb0

bb0:
  %cond2 = icmp ult i32 %val, 200
  call void(i1,...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond2) [ "deopt"() ]
  br i1 %c, label %left, label %right

left:
  %cond3 = icmp ult i32 %val, 200
  call void(i1,...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cond3) [ "deopt"() ]
  br label %right

right:
  br label %left
}

define void @test6(i1 %c, i32* %ptr) {
; Check that we do not DSE over calls to @llvm.experimental.guard.
; Guard intrinsics do _read_ memory, so th call to guard below needs
; to see the store of 500 to %ptr

; CHECK-LABEL: @test6(
; CHECK-NEXT:  store i32 500, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %c) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK-NEXT:  store i32 600, i32* %ptr


  store i32 500, i32* %ptr
  call void(i1,...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %c) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 600, i32* %ptr
  ret void
}

define void @test07(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
; Check that we are able to remove the guards on the same condition even if the
; condition is not being recalculated.

; CHECK-LABEL: @test07(
; CHECK-NEXT:  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
; CHECK-NEXT:  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK-NEXT:  ret void

  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  ret void
}

define void @test08(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32* %ptr) {
; Check that we deal correctly with stores when removing guards in the same
; block in case when the condition is not recalculated.

; CHECK-LABEL: @test08(
; CHECK-NEXT:  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
; CHECK-NEXT:  store i32 100, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK-NEXT:  store i32 400, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:  ret void

  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
  store i32 100, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 200, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 300, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 400, i32* %ptr
  ret void
}

define void @test09(i32 %a, i32 %b, i1 %c, i32* %ptr) {
; Similar to test08, but with more control flow.
; TODO: Can we get rid of the store in the end of entry given that it is
; post-dominated by other stores?

; CHECK-LABEL: @test09(
; CHECK:       entry:
; CHECK-NEXT:    %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 100, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 400, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 %c, label %if.true, label %if.false
; CHECK:       if.true:
; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 500, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %merge
; CHECK:       if.false:
; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 600, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %merge
; CHECK:       merge:
; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void

entry:
  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
  store i32 100, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 200, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 300, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 400, i32* %ptr
  br i1 %c, label %if.true, label %if.false

if.true:
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 500, i32* %ptr
  br label %merge

if.false:
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 600, i32* %ptr
  br label %merge

merge:
  ret void
}

define void @test10(i32 %a, i32 %b, i1 %c, i32* %ptr) {
; Make sure that non-dominating guards do not cause other guards removal.

; CHECK-LABEL: @test10(
; CHECK:       entry:
; CHECK-NEXT:    %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 %c, label %if.true, label %if.false
; CHECK:       if.true:
; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 100, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %merge
; CHECK:       if.false:
; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 200, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %merge
; CHECK:       merge:
; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 300, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 400, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void

entry:
  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
  br i1 %c, label %if.true, label %if.false

if.true:
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 100, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  br label %merge

if.false:
  store i32 200, i32* %ptr
  br label %merge

merge:
  store i32 300, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 400, i32* %ptr
  ret void
}

define void @test11(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32* %ptr) {
; Make sure that branching condition is applied to guards.

; CHECK-LABEL: @test11(
; CHECK:       entry:
; CHECK-NEXT:    %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 %cmp, label %if.true, label %if.false
; CHECK:       if.true:
; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %merge
; CHECK:       if.false:
; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 false) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %merge
; CHECK:       merge:
; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void

entry:
  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
  br i1 %cmp, label %if.true, label %if.false

if.true:
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  br label %merge

if.false:
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  br label %merge

merge:
  ret void
}

define void @test12(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
; Check that the assume marks its condition as being true (and thus allows to
; eliminate the dominated guards).

; CHECK-LABEL: @test12(
; CHECK-NEXT:  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
; CHECK-NEXT:  call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
; CHECK-NEXT:  ret void

  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
  call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  ret void
}

define void @test13(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32* %ptr) {
; Check that we deal correctly with stores when removing guards due to assume.

; CHECK-LABEL: @test13(
; CHECK-NEXT:  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
; CHECK-NEXT:  call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
; CHECK-NEXT:  store i32 400, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:  ret void

  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
  call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
  store i32 100, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 200, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 300, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 400, i32* %ptr
  ret void
}

define void @test14(i32 %a, i32 %b, i1 %c, i32* %ptr) {
; Similar to test13, but with more control flow.
; TODO: Can we get rid of the store in the end of entry given that it is
; post-dominated by other stores?

; CHECK-LABEL: @test14(
; CHECK:       entry:
; CHECK-NEXT:    %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 400, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 %c, label %if.true, label %if.false
; CHECK:       if.true:
; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 500, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %merge
; CHECK:       if.false:
; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 600, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %merge
; CHECK:       merge:
; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void

entry:
  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
  call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
  store i32 100, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 200, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 300, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 400, i32* %ptr
  br i1 %c, label %if.true, label %if.false

if.true:
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 500, i32* %ptr
  br label %merge

if.false:
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 600, i32* %ptr
  br label %merge

merge:
  ret void
}

define void @test15(i32 %a, i32 %b, i1 %c, i32* %ptr) {
; Make sure that non-dominating assumes do not cause guards removal.

; CHECK-LABEL: @test15(
; CHECK:       entry:
; CHECK-NEXT:    %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 %c, label %if.true, label %if.false
; CHECK:       if.true:
; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 100, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %merge
; CHECK:       if.false:
; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 200, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %merge
; CHECK:       merge:
; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 300, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:    call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 400, i32* %ptr
; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void

entry:
  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
  br i1 %c, label %if.true, label %if.false

if.true:
  call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
  store i32 100, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  br label %merge

if.false:
  store i32 200, i32* %ptr
  br label %merge

merge:
  store i32 300, i32* %ptr
  call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
  store i32 400, i32* %ptr
  ret void
}

define void @test16(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
; Check that we don't bother to do anything with assumes even if we know the
; condition being true.

; CHECK-LABEL: @test16(
; CHECK-NEXT:    %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void

  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
  call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
  call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
  ret void
}

define void @test17(i32 %a, i32 %b, i1 %c, i32* %ptr) {
; Check that we don't bother to do anything with assumes even if we know the
; condition being true or false (includes come control flow).

; CHECK-LABEL: @test17(
; CHECK:       entry:
; CHECK-NEXT:    %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 %c, label %if.true, label %if.false
; CHECK:       if.true:
; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %merge
; CHECK:       if.false:
; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %merge
; CHECK:       merge:
; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void

entry:
  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, %b
  br i1 %c, label %if.true, label %if.false

if.true:
  call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
  br label %merge

if.false:
  call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
  br label %merge

merge:
  ret void
}

define void @test18(i1 %c) {
; Check that we don't bother to do anything with assumes even if we know the
; condition being true and not being an instruction.

; CHECK-LABEL: @test18(
; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @llvm.assume(i1 %c)
; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @llvm.assume(i1 %c)
; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void

  call void @llvm.assume(i1 %c)
  call void @llvm.assume(i1 %c)
  ret void
}